|
home

intro

feeling the walls

non-participation

blogging & lurking :

learning styles

summary

Ava's blog
A-M and Ava's wiki
|
| Why opt to lurk rather than post? |
The Benfield article listed several reasons why students were reluctant
to contribute online. This made me wonder whether there might be other
(positive?) reasons for online silence [see: lurking,
reasons why]? Indeed the most common reason people chose to not
contribute posts was because they were seemingly quite happy reading
and browsing. |
| |
|
| How common is lurking? |
Before I focused on non-active participation (lurking) I wanted
to get an idea of how prevalent this behaviour was in online communities
[see:categories
of users]. This article suggests that there are 3 categories of
users in an online community, each of which differs by a multiple
of 10. So, for every 1000 lurkers there are 100 participants and 10
key contributors. Lurking, rather than being a minority behaviour
is one followed by the vast majority - and when given the option of
posting or not posting most people choose to not do so. |
| |
|
| Lurking as a learning strategy: |
After reading an article by Williams
suggesting that "Discussion and sharing experience have been
identified as two of the most effective means by which adults learn"
I became confused. As suggested above lurking is widespread and there
are a wide variety of reasons for doing so... most of these are not
copping out but are instead strategic behaviours. However if there
is little online interaction can one assume that the value of the
discussion board in a learning context is reduced? Both bloggers and
lurkers 'do' their learning away from the online community, and learning
isn't consolidated by online interaction but by reading and/or private
reflection [see: blogger
= lurker?]. Hence bloggers and lurkers are not making use of the
discussion and sharing components. |
| |
|
| Impact of lurking on the learning community: |
Why might one person contribute towards the knowledge capital
[Reingold]
by posting to a blog or discussion whilst others (despite being very
involved by their reading/learning) do not? Whilst some learners may
meet their learning needs by lurking the wider community receives
little or no benefit from the lurkers [see: blogger
= lurker?]. The presence of non-contributors significantly changes
the dynamic because whilst their learning needs may be being met those
of the blogger/solo-discussion-poster may not [see: feedback
and JSB]. It's also a little artificial because the blog may not
be as private as it appears to the blogger, nor the discussion board
as uninspiring as its number of contributions suggest. |
| |
next: learning styles |
|